Oedipus character flaw is ego. Keeping in mind that Sophocles made it very clear that Oedipus was a man of so much pride that he may have thought himself to be akin to a god, was not Oedipus basically stripped of that pride at the end of the play? Oedipus then travels to Thebes, and finds out about plague from the Sphinx, a monster who caused pain and misery for the inhabitants of the city. Years earlier, after receiving a prophecy about being slain by his own son, he has his infant son banished from Thebes. His twin sons, Eteocles and Polyneices, inherit the throne. Sophocles seizes every opportunity to exploit this dramatic irony. Now blinded and disgraced, Oedipus begs Creon to kill him, but as the play concludes, he quietly submits to Creon's leadership, and humbly awaits the oracle that will determine whether he will stay in Thebes or be cast out forever. Oedipus, in short, sounds every bit the modern American politician grandstanding on crime.
Oedipus assumes that he is Corinthian born and bred because that is wh … ere he is relocated not too long after birth in Thebes. As the play opens, the citizens of Thebes beg their king, Oedipus, to lift the plague that threatens to destroy the city. He then took the gold pins that held her robes and, with them, stabbed out his eyes. Oedipus needed a punishment to make him realize these flaws. After all factors have been considered, I think that only Oedipus' banishment was the necessary punishment.
Oedipus castigates the citizens of Thebes for letting the murderer go unknown so long. He was by no means stupid, in fact he came off as quite a clever man, but his was a world of blindness because of pride and power. In fact, the messenger himself gave Oedipus to the royal couple when a shepherd offered him an abandoned baby from the house of Laius. Yet in the midst of his escape, he stumbles upon an old man and some servants, and he kills them all as a result of a quarrel. The Problem of Fate A more interesting possibility is that Oedipus' true crime was fighting the gods.
It projects certain cultural values and morals onto the Athenian audience of the time through many different tragic conventions. At first the shepherd refuses to speak, but under threat of death he tells what he knows — Oedipus is actually the son of Laius and Jocasta. Knowing full well that his kingdom would eventually find out his acts, how could he hold his head up when walking through the city streets? Killing his dad and sleeping with his mother was bad enough yuck! Still, Oedipus worries about fulfilling the prophecy with his mother, Merope, a concern Jocasta dismisses. Polybus and Merope are not Oedipus' real parents. Oedipus was a victim of fate, incapable of free will, and as such he should have not been punished, save banishment only to cure the plague. Banishment was the only choice. He spent the last 13 years of his life in exile.
Yet, he does not commit suicide, as Jocasta does. This is the first insight of the death of Laius. Can one really control their own fate, though? Oedipus was a victim of fate, incapable of free will, and as such he should have not been punished, save banishment only to cure the plague. For a moment, Oedipus takes upon himself the role of a god—a role the Chorus has been both reluctant and eager to allow him see 39—43. Oedipus is faced with trying to run away from his fate.
He claims that though Apollo ordained his destiny, it was he alone who pierced his own eyes. A small company of men surrounding a chariot force him off the road, and he becomes angry and kills all of them but one. Keeping in mind that Sophocles made it very clear that Oedipus was a man of so much pride that he may have thought himself to be akin to a god, was not Oedipus basically stripped of that pride at the end of the play? In gratitude, the city officials offer him the hand of Iokaste and the crown of Thebes. Despite the fact that the Christian god is not present in the play, one is aware that Shakespeare is more knowledgeable and biased towards a Christian god than any Greek god, so it is unsurprising that such a Christian idea or theme exists in the play. However, his regret of his behavior is punishment in itself.
He is obviously extremely confident. This offended the gods though they only show up indirectly in the drama , and in the end Oedipus is blinded and exiled. For example, when the old priest tells Oedipus that the people of Thebes are dying of the plague, Oedipus says that he could not fail to see this 68—72. I believe he expresses some of the things that Sophocles is trying to say to the audience. The question is: Did Oedipus deserve his punishments? There are much easier ways of becoming blind to the world than stabbing one's eyes out. However, others say that fate is uncontrollable and therefore he was not responsible for his actions. Jocasta his wife realizes whom Oedipus really is as well as what happened to Laius and kills herself.
In conclusion, by ruining his country, trying to exceed his fate, and suffering from tragic flaws, Oedipus has truly learned that acceptance is the great lesson that suffering teaches Sophocles. Marrying his mother and bearing children with her becomes Oedipus downfall for the incest and shame it brings to himself and his family. The chorus makes this clear: 'Pride is the germ of kings; Pride, when puffed up, vainly, with many things Unseasonable, unfitting, mounts the wall, Only to hurry to that fatal fall, Where feet are vain to serve her' Pride, then, is what kings are made of -- and what will bring them down. There are many factors that must be considered in answering this, including how Oedipus himself felt about his situation. Oedipus therefore inherits the divine ill … will against Polydorus as well as the curse on all his descendants made by Dionysos, the wine god and Polydorus' first cousin. His motive for doing this is that he wanted to leave the audience impacted by what they saw or read.
Or does fate itself control an individual? For a moment, Oedipus takes upon himself the role of a god—a role the Chorus has been both reluctant and eager to allow him see 39—43. First written in Greek mythology this play is about a King of Thebes whose ego overshadowed his ability to focus on his the necessary things to stabilize his kingdom; his anger and pride eventually led to his down fall. Additionally, Oedipus physically puts out his own eyes, for several reasons which will be discussed later. The theme is the general doctrine or belief implicit in the drama, which the author seeks to make persuasive to the reader Abrams 170. Oedipus is then sent to another city, Cornith, where King Polybus raises him as his own blood.
Creon forgives Oedipus for his past accusations of treason and asks that Oedipus be sent inside so that the public display of shame might stop. Immoral, to be sure, but Oedipus was obviously ignorant to his actions, and to my knowledge, in Sophoclean times, there was no written law against it and therefore no punishment for it. Oedipus was a victim of fate, incapable of free will, and as such he should have not been punished, save banishment only to cure the plague. Oedipus castigates the citizens of Thebes for letting the murderer go unknown so long. Oedipus hamartia may most directly be his mistakes, but ultimately. He therefore is Oedipus' brother-in-law and uncle.